The expansion of human cities, farming and infrastructure is (sic) the main reason. Dignitaries including UN chief Ban Ki-moon...will speak at the launch in Berlin. Mr Ban is due to say that human expansion is wiping out species at about 1,000 times the 'natural' or 'background' rate, and that 'business as usual is not an option'.
As usual, Mr Black - in pursuit of his greenie zealotry - obviously thinks the science is totally settled and the words of Mr Ban are the Holy Writ. It's the Wicked West to blame, as always. Shame that he could not do a little journalism and look for alternative views - this, for example from the Watt's Up With That? blog. It points out that despite all the hot air about extinction:
Very few continental birds or mammals are recorded as having gone extinct, and none have gone extinct from habitat reduction alone. No continental forest bird or mammal is recorded as having gone extinct from any cause. Since the species-area relationship predicts that there should have been a very large number of recorded bird and mammal extinctions from habitat reduction over the last half millennium, I show that the species-area relationship gives erroneous answers to the question of extinction rates.
Complex stuff, but it shows just how deeply, deeply one-sided the BBC always is in its science coverage.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment