
The episode from Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, will air on March 11 - during International Women's Week."
The BBC is in serious breach of its own guidelines. It has become a dangerous and subversive organisation, funded by an unjust and compulsory tax on the British public. Our aim is to stop the subversive activities of the BBC by campaigning for the abolition of the licence fee.

I’m not surprised at the level of UK scepticism as the main impacts of climate change are decades away and in other places. The problem is poor science awareness. We need to improve science education so people properly understand climate science.
Q: I’m disturbed by the panel’s attitude. Scepticism is legitimate, denialism not. The events shouldn’t be called anything-Gate as that implied conspiracy and there was none. Why haven’t the media found out who stole the emails and wasn’t the timing of their release interesting?
DA: We can no longer call people deniers. We need a new term. Some people have suggested “climate creationists”.
FH: Sceptics were clever in choosing their name. We do need a new name, denier won’t work because of Holocaust associations.
Q: What was the influence of the blogosphere?
RB: probably bad.
FH: I’m astonished by the viciousness of anonymous people on the internet.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.

Award winning comedian and broadcaster Marcus Brigstocke will join forces with TV and radio comedy friends Russell Howard (Mock the Week), Alastair McGowan (The Big Impression), Mark Steele (NewsQuiz) and Mitch Benn (Now Show), Robin Ince (Nerdstock) and others for a one-off night of political mayhem at the Theatre Royal…I guess the chances of hearing a Brigstocke rant or Mitch Benn song taking the piss out of the Green Party on Radio 4 are pretty low, then.
Proceeds from the gig will be going towards funding Caroline Lucas' historic bid to become the UK's first Green MP.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
'...the public has realised that there is also another BBC: a corporation that purports to be a public service but pays its Director-General a whopping £816,000 and its head of personnel more than the Prime Minister. It is an empire that schedules TV programmes to wrong-foot its rivals. Proposals seen by The Timeslook like a welcome recognition that the empire has gone too far, and should focus back on quality programming. But they actually constitute an evasive and artful strategy designed to keep the next government from intervening, while in reality changing very little.
In proposing to axe the BBC’s UK magazines, relinquish its hold on the teenage market, halve the size of its website and cut two radio stations, Director-General Mark Thompson presumably hopes to give the impression of embarking on a path of serious reform. But if he is serious about reform, he needs to do much more than axe a few radio stations that no one has ever listened to and websites that few have ever visited. The real giveaway in the proposals is that the BBC seems to have no plans to give anything back to licence-fee payers"
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Trust rules report into treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder failed to meet standards of accuracy
Read full BBC Trust ruling on Panorama's What Next for Craig?
The BBC is to broadcast an on-air correction and apology after the BBC Trust ruled that a Panorama report into the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) failed to meet the expected standards of accuracy and impartiality.
In its ruling today, the BBC Trust's editorial standards committee (ESC) ordered the corporation's management to broadcast the correction and apology at the beginning or end of Panorama in its Monday night BBC1 slot, 'due to the serious nature of the breaches' of editorial standards.
The ESC said the edition of Panorama in question, What Next for Craig?, broadcast on 12 November 2007, fell below the 'highest standards' expected of BBC1's flagship current affairs show.
'The ESC expects the highest standards from Panorama as BBC1's flagship current affairs programme, and this programme failed to reach those standards. Due to the serious nature of the breaches the ESC will apologise to the complainant on behalf of the BBC and require the broadcast of a correction,' the committee added.
The ESC also said the edition of Panorama should not be sold to other broadcasters or repeated by the BBC and gave management five working days to remove from the corporation's website any material from What Next for Craig? that was found to be in breach of editorial guidelines.
A complainant who had already dealt with BBC management's editorial complaints unit procedure appealed to the ESC, arguing that Panorama's report was 'seriously inaccurate and unbalanced in the way it dealt with the issue of how ADHD should be treated' and 'was likely to cause serious harm to children' with the condition.
The complainant, who first wrote to the BBC raising concerns about the programme the day after it was broadcast in November 2007, also raised issues about the way the corporation dealt with him. The ESC said decisions on this aspect of his complaint 'will be made separately'.
Panorama was not in breach of BBC editorial guidelines on harm and offence or children, but there were serious breaches on accuracy and impartiality, the ESC concluded.
On accuracy, the committee ruled that 'the programme failed to accurately report the findings of a three-year follow-up study in the USA to the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA)'.
The programme-makers should have included the views of other authors of this report and not just those of professor Pelham, according to the ESC.
Panorama also 'distorted some of the known facts in its presentation of the findings' of the study and failed to report them in context.
The BBC then failed to acknowledge 'a serious factual error' in the programme, although the ESC concluded that Panorama's production team 'did not deliberately produce a programme that they knew to be inaccurate'.
On impartiality, the ESC found 'that the programme failed to meet the requirements of impartiality in that the programme makers were not fair and open-minded when examining the evidence and weighing all the material facts, nor were they even-handed in their approach to the subject'.
Panorama's audience should also have been told there was a wider range of views on the treatment of ADHD that those expressed by Pelham, the committee added.
A BBC News spokeswoman said: 'BBC News will, of course, comply with the requirements of the BBC Trust. The trust did not conclude that the programme makers deliberately produced a programme they knew to be inaccurate. It has not questioned the integrity of the programme team but found that they had either misunderstood the underlying material that the team had in its possession, or had chosen just one interpretation of it and failed to place it in context.
'Two further complaints of material being used that might seriously impair the physical, mental or moral development of children and of not protecting the welfare of the children featured in the programme were not upheld.'
• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.
• If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly 'for publication'.

Are Nigel Farage’s rude and attention seeking remarks about the President of the European Council not conclusive proof that UKIP and he have become nothing more than a boorish national embarrassment?
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
The Now Show, the vehicle for comedians Punt and Dennis, will be renamed The Vote Now Show, for the duration of the election campaign and broadcast every Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.FFS.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Veteran journalist Jeremy Paxman was forced to apologise after using a swear word during Newsnight.

Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
The Tories have been trying to capitalise on the government's troubles, but their media policy is no more coherent
The government is struggling to salvage anything at all from Lord Carter's digital economy bill – and the thousands of hours of Ofcom and industry effort that lie behind it. There is a degree of political consensus on the issue of online piracy but little conviction that what the bill proposes will prove fair or effective in tackling it. Meanwhile, the £6-a-year tax on fixed-line phones to fund otherwise 'uneconomic' high-speed broadband rollout is fiercely opposed by the Tories, and the government has kicked its own proposal to top-slice the licence fee into the very long grass of 2016 and beyond.
Which brings us to the one major proposal that still, formally at least, remains alive – the plan to pilot the provision of local news on ITV in Scotland, Wales and north-east England via so-called independently financed news consortiums (IFNCs). But this too is running into trouble as the Tories have stepped up their opposition to it. Indeed, it is quite widely believed – not least at ITV – that the IFNC proposals will be derailed by the general election.
Throw in the somewhat intemperate attack by Ben Bradshaw, the culture secretary, on Sir Michael Lyons, the chairman of the BBC Trust, and Bradshaw's very public criticism of the whole idea (his government's) of the trust – which earned him a rebuke from No 10 – and Labour's media policy is, to put it politely, in disarray.
The Tories, meanwhile, have been doing their best to take advantage of the government's troubles. But when you look a little closer they don't appear to have a coherent media policy either. True, they are against top-slicing, describing it in terms – a threat to the BBC's independence, and so on – that will have been music to the corporation's ears. Or rather, they were until George Osborne said he planned to raid the licence fee to pay for broadband. Jeremy Hunt, Bradshaw's shadow, said he would 'tear up' the BBC charter and do away with the BBC Trust. And then said he wouldn't, because to do so mid-term would threaten the BBC's independence. More recent proposals to radically reform the trust will first need its agreement, but more worryingly appear to herald just the sort of political interference in the BBC's operations the party wants us to believe it rejects.
The Tories are opposed to IFNCs – and especially plans to spend licence fee cash on them. They talk instead of creating a more benign regulatory environment for commercial broadcasters, in the hope that ITV may not give up on regional news just yet. But practically, doing away with the contract rights renewal (CRR) mechanism governing ad rates – the major regulatory problem ITV faces – will require primary legislation that is sure to be highly controversial and take a long time to enact. So what are their proposals for securing plurality in quality TV news in the nations and regions? They don't really have any. They support the idea of local TV-based multimedia services but have no firm plans for funding them.
They set up a committee of industry heavyweights under Greg Dyke, the former BBC director general, in the hope that a suite of practical policies would emerge pre-election. It was supposed to report last autumn, but the leaked idea of replacing the licence fee with direct taxation ( a move Dyke has championed before) was opposed by other members of the group and has already been rejected by David Cameron. Months of wrangling have ensued to avoid the whole report being sunk by a headline-making proposal that will immediately be dismissed by the party. The Tories are enjoying the government's media muddles but show every sign of being potentially only weeks away from some of their own.

Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
The AJC said in a statement that it was “dismayed that a guest on BBC Radio 4 was allowed to state unchallenged” that the Mossad relies on Jews for assassination plots. “This baseless accusation crosses every red line between legitimate public discussion and bigoted fear-mongering,” said AJC executive director David Harris. “In less than a minute, the BBC has cast a shadow on the lives of Jews worldwide.” BBC Radio 4’s PM program interviewed Gordon Thomas, author of Gideon’s Spies, a book about the Mossad, about the January 20 assassination of Hamas military commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.

Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.