My guess is that NGO reports often offer an easy synthesis of already-published evidence. In my experience, NGO papers are often both accessible and accurate - though clearly written from a point of view.
Read it carefully. What I think he means - astonishingly even by his standards - is that no matter what greenie fanatic NGOs say about decisions that involve billions of pounds, it's OK, because they mean well and they know what they are doing. Equally, that it's fine if the IPCC lifts such material to pressure governments into panicking about non-existent climate threats. Now we see what the whole lying BBC edifice aound 'climate change' is built upon. The 'experience' of a dough-brained BBC reporter (who doesn't even have a a science degree) and who admires greenie activists so much that in his book, whatever they publish is probably correct. For that, I think he deserves Private Eye's OBN - with double bars and stars.
Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment